I may be wrong but i think one of the deciding factors in Roe V Wade is that they(the justices and lay people)could not determine when life began. Odd than they felt they could determine a life should end. It also flies in the face of reason. If they couldn't determine when life began then by legalizing abortion they were actually saying they KNEW it was life to begin with. So they used the term person hood. Now person is a philosophical term that if you asked 50 different people what a person is-you would get 50 different answers. It was never the question to begin with.The question is: is this a human life and if it is then it deserves not to be killed having the same right to life that is protected.
Liberals will defend abortion no matter what. The Kermit Gosnell case would have been an exception had ppl not tried to sweep it under the rug as fast as possible. The basic tenet of liberalism is that we can do what we want as long as we don't hurt anyone else.The problem with the thinking is that it ignores the REALITY that behavior has consequences.They don't want to talk about that.They believe that government can solve the problem of poverty and throwing money at it is the solution. As long as they don't have to face the fact that by encouraging immorality they are encouraging young women to have babies out of wedlock and fathers not to take responsibility.
The solution in their mind is the government giving out more money. The problem with young women having babies out of wedlock is that they end up in poverty more often than not.The young man goes onto to get other women/young girls in the same situation.
God forbid a liberal have to admit behavior has consequences and having relations outside of marriage has a lot of consequences. Why would anyone in their right mind want KIDS having KIDS. Evidently it's the case because the biggest argument liberals have is the angry 'stay out of my bedroom.' Nobody cares about their bedroom.They say this to avoid having to face that immorality is detrimental in so many ways-you don't have to be a religious person to see it.
I'm not getting why they're willing to accept promiscuity and sexualizing children at younger & younger ages when it's obvious what it's doing? It's why Planned Parenthood is their hero. They happen to be an organization that is all about permissiveness which they call tolerance.
The argument that follows the 'get out of my bedroom' argument is that pro life people don't care about the babies after they're born. Utter nonsense. First of all,it's the people involved who should care and when they don't there are many pro life and religious(faith based initiatives)groups that give time,effort and money to help both the unwed mother and her baby. You want names I can easily get them.The problem is i think they already know that their argument is a lie.
The biggest cure for what ails our country-and we have a lot of issues now brought about by liberalism-is strong traditional families. You know-a real mom and dad.We also need a compassionate culture that doesn't murder its most vulnerable.I just don't think liberals are going to be willing to admit we need to do a turn around and soon. The entertainment industry is about sexualizing children. Our institutions have become a way of indoctrinating people to liberalism and tossing out values/virtues; calling normal behaviors 'extremism and radical.'How's this for a thought that makes sense? Let kids BE kids.